B-Schools Have Eight Weeks To Lobby Against Post-Study Visa Cap

Speak with one voice and provide evidence of your contribution to UK economic growth, lobbying experts advise UK business schools

Publish a story
The UK Home Office launched a public consultation on reform of the student visa system this week
The UK Home Office launched a public consultation on reform of the student visa system this week

UK business schools have just eight weeks to make a case against the government’s proposed restrictions on post-study work visas, which will discourage talented overseas students from applying here.

This was one of the sobering conclusions of a panel of legal, academic and communications experts discussing the challenges facing “Brand Business School UK” at Tuesday’s UK Business School Communications Conference.

Immigration solicitor Maria Patsalos of law firm Mishcon de Reya summarised the Government’s proposed changes to the student visa system. The Home Office announced the changes on Tuesday.

The Home Secretary, Theresa May, has been charged with bringing migration to the UK down “from hundreds of thousands to tens of thousands”.

As part of this effort, Tier 2 visas for skilled workers with job offers will be capped at capped 20,700 from April 2011 to April 2012.

The cap excludes intra-company transfers – people being transferred by their employer from an overseas office to a UK office – after heavy lobbying by multinational companies.

Tier 1 visas for skilled workers with no job offer will also be capped or scrapped depending on the category.

There will be no cap on visas for Tier 1 visas for investors or entrepreneurs – groups who must invest in £1m or £200,000 in the UK respectively.

Visas in the general category, previously called he highly skilled migrant program, covering scientists, artists and academics will be capped at 1,000 per year.

Post-study work visas will be abolished as of April 2011. Currently, overseas graduates of degree-level programs in the UK are automatically eligible for a two-year work visa, and 38,000 were issued last year.

Patsalos said the proposed changes would “fewer opportunities to gain employment would obviously make the UK a less attractive place to study”.

Other speakers agreed, and warned of the long-term economic impact on the UK of turning talented foreigners away.

David Simmons, International development Director at Cranfield School of Management, said that UK business schools had been on the back foot at a recent admissions conference in Sao Paulo, Brazil.

While US and Canadian schools were confident about the work permits on offer to graduates – Canada also offer overseas graduates a two-year work visa – UK business schools had to say they “didn’t know” what would happen to students after they graduated.

Simmons pointed to a recent study by Nottingham Business School and the Association of Business Schools, that found that foreign students at UK business schools contribute £2 billion to the economy directly, and £7 billion indirectly. Putting them off would cause damage “that could last 30 or 40 years” to the UK’s economy and academic standing.

Sharon Bamford, Chief Executive of accreditation body AMBA (the Association of MBAs), said that UK higher education was still respected as a ”quality product” overseas, but had been undervalued by the government and by institutions.

From the introduction of higher fees for overseas students in the 1980s to the current restrictions on work permits, the UK had long sent mixed messages to foreign students about whether they were wanted or not. “As a result, may of the brightest people have gone to the US... and set up very successful businesses there,” said Bamford.

UK business schools could soon find that they are losing market share not only to the US and Europe, but to a growing number of institutions in India and China too, she added.

Catherine Marston, who covers international students and academics for industry group Universities UK warned that government planned to squeeze other aspects of migration and working in the UK that would affect students, such as cutting the hours of work permitted during term time.

Solicitor Maria Patsalos and political communications specialist Charles Lewington offered advice to business schools on how they can lobby the government during the eight-week consultation period for these proposals.

Patsalos said that business schools’ best bet is to argue for a specific objective. For example, for the government to cut the post-study work visa from two years to six months, rather than abolishing it altogether.

Charles Lewington, founder of Hanover Communications and former Conservative Party communications director, shared six pointers for a successful lobbying effort by UK business schools.

First, schools should speak with one voice. “This requires co-ordination through Universities UK or independently,” said Lewington. “Choose one or two schools to lead”.

Second, business schools will need detailed evidence in support of their position. “It’s no good making threats or issuing warnings without any substance... you need to commission someone to collate the evidence so that it passes muster with the Home Office and the Treasury.”

Third, schools must be clear about the technical solution they are seeking. Here, Lewington echoed Patsalos’ point about arguing for a specific reduction in the length of the visa.

Fourth, in addition to their “asks”, business schools need to position themselves as being part of the solution. “With the scale and speed of these spending cuts, everyone is pleading a special case. You need to think strategically about the contribution of business schools to the UK economy, or to driving growth in sectors other tan financial services.”

The Treasury is a key department to convince along with the Home Office said Lewington, because the Treasury is responsible for economic growth.

Fifth, business schools must agree on their brand. “If your brand is an expression of your values, you must collectively agree what those values are,” said Lewington. “What do you mean by excellence, what are your innovative products... how do you contribute to improving ethics in business?”

Finally, schools should be aware of the different political actors influencing this consultation. There are more MPs with business degrees and business experience now than there have been over the last 15 years.

Ministers other than Theresa May could also be useful allies: Business Secretary Vince Cable and David Willetts, Minister of State for Universities and Science, would support business schools as an important UK export, and as a destination for leading academics.

However business schools would have to be aware of the complexities of coalition politics, added Lewington. “Anything that appeals to Vince Cable may cause Theresa May to dig her heels in,” he said

The UK Business School Communications Conference was organised by BusinessBecause.com and Mana Communications, held at held at Cass Business School, and sponsored by Grenoble Ecole de Management and Google.
 

Share |

15 January 2011
 

So sad to see UK going on the wrong track; Big opportunities for US and Canadian Universities.

It would be interesting to see in coming times that which direction, lack of sanity coupled with arrogance of Conservatives, takes the UK educational sector.

Non-EU students are very vulnerable for all political point scoring (but people in the UK easily forget that these students pay horrendous money from studying to living expenses!).

A business case for UK universities survival that cash cows (international students) will be barred away and there will be empty hands with nothing to milk from! also not to forget when universities are already bleeding from funding cuts.


17 December 2010
 

Will a lobby really happen...and will anything really change as a result. Perhaps B-school students should help in the effort to lobby the government.


13 December 2010
 

this is complete disgrace. at a time when businesses are encouraged to build links with the emerging markets and recruit people who understand global markets, why are we throwing international talent out of the country and shunning these individuals from our work force. the government's gone mad.


12 December 2010
 

hello my names is nick clegg. i want to keep as many intelligent foreign students out of the uk a spossible. that way hopefully fewer people will cotton on to how full of shit i am


10 December 2010
 

Hello Everybody Here is the link for the tier 1 rules and regulations for the applicants going to APPLY INSIDE THE UK. and OUTSIDE THE UK,

Hope helps you guys.

http://www.ukba.homeoffice.gov.uk/sitecontent/newsarticles/2010/dec/15-limit-reached-tier1-dec

Good Luck !!


 

1.

has anyone ever tried to figure out how much international students spend during the 2 year post study work visa? especially the kids from oil coutries and boom economies like china. they rent expensive apartments, buy luxury goods, their parents buy them luxury apartments, they drive fancy cars. wouldn't the more rational approach be simply to raise the amount of money these people need to prove they have? no, because that wouldn't directly translate to more disability benefits for Mr. Smith's broken fingernail and his son's jobseekers' allowance. nothing screams populist more than "we'll get those foreigners out!". surefire way to appease the closet BNPs :)

2.

the post-study work visa in many circumstances i've seen, is more a curse than a blessing to foreign students themselves. a lot of these guys who come here and finish studying can get great, decently-paying, highly respected jobs back home, but because of the thrill of working overseas and perhaps some residual colonial influence, decide to stay here and take up jobs that are below their capabilities. c'mon. you all know who you are.

3.

my somalian neighbours, whose rent is paid for by the UK government while i scrape by with less than a hundred quid a month in savings, have a much better time than me. and they're coming in by the droves with no one talking about a "cap" or "abolishing" their visa (if said visa exists). it's not my business that this generation of british people still feel the need to unsustainably love asylum seekers, but if it takes a foreigner to point out that this is financially unsustainable and frankly quite stupid then maybe you should find one.


 

The UK Government introduced an interim limit on the number of initial Tier 1 (General) visa applications that can be issued overseas on 19 July 2010. The limit does not affect applications from Tier 1 (General) dependents or applications for Tier 1 visas made from within the UK. This limit is in effect until 31 March 2011, after which a permanent cap will be introduced.

The UK Border Agency (UKBA) administers the limit on a monthly basis. As of 07 December 2010, all 600 Tier 1 (General) visas available for the month of December have been used up.


 

very informed piece, thank you - i'd heard rumours - but alas they seem to be true - not sure what the government is trying to achieve but seems absurd to destroy the 'brand' of british education overseas and sending a message that we don't want international graduates to work in this country.


 

Even when a politically conservative country, such as Japan, is scrambling to take on overseas talents and absorb more international students so as to foster the future of their economic development. I hate to say it, definitely, I can foresee it should probably cause more harm to the UK economy and its country image outside EU after all. For one thing, Not every international student wants to stay in UK for good after a full time employment through the current PSW route when it comes to thinking about the high tax rate in UK and the raise of China`s economy.

However, a few years of full time working experience after graduation in any countries, where you studied abroad, will doubtlessly empower your international competitiveness and enrich your life experience in the real business world. UK governments should understand this thing.

Studying overseas is one thing, working overseas is another thing totally. While the latter one can empower international students competitiveness in their home country labor market. If the PSW is abolished, more the likely, less and less Asian students would consider studying aboard in UK except those who are incredibly rich and have too much money and do not know how to spend it... The ROI of pursuing education in UK will then come to the mind of most non-EU students.


Post new comment

Login to post new comment or post a quick comment below (your email address will remain private):

Suggestions:

If you already have a profile on BusinessBecause.com why not login now?
Type your comment here!
By posting this comment you agree to our terms and conditions
Maria Ahmed
By Maria Ahmed
09/12/2010

Tags:

AMBA
City University: Cass Business School
post-study work
UK Business Schools
David Simmons
Maria Patsalos
Mishcon de Reya
Sharon Bamford
Catherine Marston
Universities UK
Charles Lewington
Hanover Communications
uk student visa system
immigration laws
british student visa
british home office
tier one visa
Theresa May

Email this to a friend
Your name:

Your email:

Your friend's email: